Tag Archive: BSC


Believe it or not, college football finally got it right.

Now let’s not screw it up.National Championship - Oregon v Ohio State

Think of it this way, there have been three eras in college football: The Bowl Era; the BCS and for the first time this past season, the College Football Playoff.

Using these three systems, only one would have produced the Ohio State Buckeyes as the national champion even though they would have played Oregon in the terminal bowl under each of the trio of regimes.

The other “champions” would have been Florida State (bowl system) and Alabama (BSC).

The Bowl Era

As a young tadpole, the author of Almost DailyBrett remembers spending virtually all of New Year’s Day watching the bowls.

As a football manager of the USC Trojans in 1976, we lost one damn game, our opener against Missouri at the LA Coliseum. That loss cost us dearly. We were contractually tied into the Rose Bowl. We beat Michigan. We ended up No. 2 in all the land.

Pitt with Heisman Trophy winner Tony Dorsett went to the Sugar Bowl and ended the season, No. 1 and undefeated. We never had a chance to play them.

Using this very same bowl system, Florida State as the ACC champion would have gone to the Orange Bowl. Alabama as the ESECPN champ would been dispatched to the Sugar Bowl. Oregon and Ohio State would have played in “The Granddaddy of Them All,” the Rose Bowl.

If Florida State prevailed in the Orange Bowl, regardless of the opponent, the Seminoles would have been the national champion because of its perfect season and an unbeaten streak of 30-straight. There is zero doubt about this conclusion because everyone else had at least one loss.

Reality check time: This is the same Florida State team that survived a series of close calls against basketball schools only to be literally destroyed by Oregon 59-20 in the Rose Bowl (e.g. first playoff semifinal) as the Ducks feasted on five Florida State turnovers.GTY 460965378 S SPO FBC USA CA

So much for Florida State as the national champion, and its 29-game winning streak.

The BSC Era

In order to solve the automatic bowl tie-in conundrum, the college football gods came up with the Bowl Championship Series (BCS).

Reflecting back on the unfortunate BSC era, the idea was to create a non-subjective human/computer ranking system that would disregard bowl tie-ins and conceivably send the best two teams in all the land to the BCS Championship Game.

Besides triggering coast-to-coast controversy, the flawed subjective system paved the way for sanity to ensue in the form of a four-team playoff.

If the BSC still existed this past season, is there any doubt that Florida State and Alabama (e.g., the two semifinal losers) would have played in the Championship Game? And the winner most likely would have been Alabama, making everyone at ESECPN (e.g., Rece “Alabama” Davis, Jesse “Florida” Palmer, David “Georgia” Pollack, Lee “Florida State” Corso …) real happy.

The two playoff finalists (e.g., the teams that handily beat Alabama and Florida State respectively) would have played in the Rose Bowl. Translated: the result of the Ohio State vs. Oregon Rose Bowl would have been irrelevant in determining the national champion.

Thankfully: The Playoff Era

Ohio State would have been locked into the Rose Bowl under the auspices of the bowl era. Under the BSC, the Buckeyes would have been relegated to the Rose Bowl because the college football Pharisees would have selected undefeated Florida State and ESECPN champ Alabama.

In neither case would Ohio State be able to compete for the national title even though the Buckeyes have now proved they are the best team in the land.

The college football playoff provided the backdrop for Ohio State to play for and win the national title. Baylor and TCU may be upset about being left out of the dance, but doing the Texas two-step … there is no way the Bears or Horned Frogs would have beaten the Buckeyes.

There are some who may clamor for an eight-team playoff or a 16-team playoff, a 32-team playoff, a 64-team playoff, a 128-team playoff (e.g., Oregon State would be playing for the national championship).

Yes, there are five major conferences and increasingly inconsequential Notre Dame and one champion obviously will not make it to the four-team dance. Three wouldn’t have made it to the BSC championship game.buckeye

Let’s leave well enough alone. The College Football Playoff worked. Let’s salute The College Football Playoff for a job well done, and also the Fighting Chestnuts of Ohio State.

http://www.collegefootballplayoff.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowl_Championship_Series

http://www.collegefootballplayoff.com/rose-bowl

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_Bowl_Game

 

 

 

“When in doubt, declare victory.” — Oft heard political axiom in Sacramento.

For some reason, Jeff Long, chair of the College Football Playoff Committee, could not simply proclaim that his 12-member committee got it right: The four-best football teams in the country are in the long-awaited, first-ever January 1 playoff for the championship trophy.

In the face of persistent badgering by 1988 Alabama graduate Rece Davis of ESECPN, Long came across as defensive, almost apologetic and unsure. He inadvisably went down paths best left untrodden, and seemingly couldn’t wait for the public grilling to end.

ReceLong

Admittedly, the present University of Arkansas athletic director was operating on little, if no sleep. He and his committee members had a thankless job; shoehorn four major conference champions into two bowls, and leave one big-time conference champion out in the cold (e.g., Baylor).

Guess what? This problem will persist next year. Get used to it.

Here are some PR talking points for Chairman Long free of charge, courtesy of Almost DailyBrett:

“We had a tough job to do. We did our job. And we came up with exciting semifinal matchups involving the best four teams across the fruited plain (i.e., Alabama vs. Ohio State in the Sugar Bowl, and Oregon vs. Florida State in the Rose Bowl). We are proud of our work, and we can hardly wait for January 1.”

Period. Finis. Endo Musico.

Far Better Than The BSC

Many, many moons ago, the conference champs were simply locked into the major bowls. If this scenario was still the case: Alabama would be in the Sugar Bowl; Oregon and Ohio State would be in the Rose Bowl; Florida State would be in the Orange Bowl; Baylor would be in the Fiesta Bowl … and TCU would still be moaning and complaining.

How would one determine the national champion? The polls? The computers? ESECPN?

The BSC … err BCS (Bowl Championship Series) … was devised to improve upon the automatic bowl lock-ups, producing supposedly a matchup of the best two teams in the country.

If that was still the case, Alabama would be playing Oregon and undefeated Florida State would be left out … or would they?

Wait a minute would the BSC exclude the defending national champions, the winner of 29 straight games and counting? Of course not.

Bye-bye, Oregon.

The Tri-Lateral Commission for Dominance by the Eastern Time Zone (TLCDETZ) and ESECPN would not allow a team located in a sparsely populated Western state in America’s cul-de-sac (e.g., Pacific Northwest) to throw a monkey wrench into a classic matchup between SEC-champion Alabama and pseudo-SEC team, Florida State.

You can be sure that Davis (Alabama), Jesse Palmer (Florida), David Pollack (Georgia) and Danny Kanell (Florida State) would not allow that to happen. Ditto for Kirk Herbstreit (Ohio State), Joey Galloway (Ohio State), Lee Corso (Florida State), Desmond Howard (Michigan), Lou Holtz (Kent State) or Mark May (Pitt).

Did you note the time zone for these gents’ alma maters? The Eastern Time Zone.

It must really bum them out that Oregon’s Marcus Mariota is going to win the Heisman. Guess, there really must be life west of the Hudson.

A Four-Team Playoff for the Ages

The committee made the ill-fated decision that Chairman Long was going to be its one-and-only spokesperson.

Don’t get me wrong, Long comes across as a nice competent guy, but does not have the smoothness, confidence and gravitas to serve as an effective spokesman.condi

The committee could have turned to Stanford Provost Condoleezza Rice, who earlier served as national security advisor and secretary of state for two administrations or USC Athletic Director and Rhodes Scholar Pat Haden to carry the PR ball.

Something tells me that neither Rice nor Haden would have publicly punted the ball in the face of the fierce ESECPN verbal pass rush.

haden

Let’s face it: No system is perfect, but this one is easily better than any that has come before or any other (e.g., an eight-team playoff; there are not eight great teams … and number nine would be whining).

This is where the When in doubt, declare victory mantra works.

Regardless of the questions from the Pharisees at ESECPN, a confident spokesperson (e.g., Rice or Haden) keeps coming back to how this system is easily the best, far better than anything that preceded it, and best of all, the top four teams in the land are going to get it on.

Let’s tee it up on New Year’s Day.

http://espn.go.com/college-football/

http://www.collegefootballplayoff.com/selection-committee

http://espnmediazone.com/us/bios/davis_rece/

 

 

“I don’t want to play in a Rose Bowl unless I’m playing for a national championship.” – Oregon wide receiver, Josh Huff

“It’s not a big deal at all … We already won a Rose Bowl, so I feel like it’s whatever.” – Oregon running back/receiver/athlete De’Anthony Thomas

NCAA Football: Rose Bowl-Wisconsin vs Oregon

The 100th Anniversary Rose Bowl … “Whatever”?

Former Oregon quarterback Joey Harrington was shaking his head reflecting on DAT’s Rose Bowl whatever  dismissal during the latest installment of Comcast’s “Talking Ducks.”

Harrington grew up in Portland, Oregon dreaming of playing in Pasadena on New Year’s Day.

He took the Ducks to three consecutive bowl game wins: The Sun over Minnesota in 1999; the Holiday over Texas in 2000; and the Fiesta on New Year’s Day 2002 over Colorado. Three-for-three for “Captain Comeback,” but no Rose Bowl.

An awful Civil War game against Oregon State on a frigid November Saturday in 2000, and a nightmare fourth quarter against Stanford in October, 2001, kept Harrington out of Pasadena for the final two years of his college career. His ultimate dream was not realized, and it obviously still hurts to this day.

joeyharrington

Josh Huff and De’Anthony Thomas are good guys and their comments are understandable, considering that Stanford pretty much put the kibosh on Oregon competing for the national championship.

To some the Rose Bowl has become a consolation prize, largely because of the BCS. Similar sentiments are being heard in Columbus, Ohio, where an undefeated Ohio State team may be relegated to…the Rose Bowl.

“I don’t mind playing in the Rose Bowl, playing for the fans and my teammates,” Huff said. “But deep down I don’t wanna be a prep game for the national championship game.”

It hasn’t always been this way, and it really shouldn’t be this way.

Growing up I didn’t want to die without seeing the Rolling Stones live, and the Ducks in the Rose Bowl.

I achieved Satisfaction (even hearing the song played live three times), doing my best Jumpin’ Jack Flash with the Stones six times, proving that you can get what you want.

The first Oregon Rose Bowl in the modern era came in 1994 from an Oregon team forecasted to finish 10th in the Pacific 10 conference. Tears were rolling down collective faces as the band played “Mighty Oregon” on the floor of the Rose Bowl on New Year’s Day.

There was no place else I was going to be on Planet Earth for those four hours on January 2, 1995 (Never on Sunday for the Tournament of Roses).

Since that time, the Ducks have been back to Pasadena twice, losing to Ohio State in the 2010 game and beating Wisconsin two years later. And now the Ducks sit on the precipice of their third trip to the Rose Bowl in five years.

oregonrosebowl

As Ronald Reagan would say, “Not bad, not bad at all.”

Almost DailyBrett generally refrains from making categorical, unequivocal statements but will state for the record that Pasadena, California on New Year’s Day is gorgeous on the most beautiful day of the year. The Los Angeles smog takes the day off. The skies are blue. The air is warm. The tailgate parties on Brookside Golf Course are rocking and rolling by 8:30 am, about five hours before kickoff.

My childhood home was literally next door in Glendale, The Bedroom of Los Angeles (dubbed out of the sheer boredom of the LA suburb, not for rampant sexual activity). You could almost hit the Rose Bowl with a rock from the balcony of my high school, St. Francis, in adjacent La Cañada.

I always dreamed of going to the Rose Bowl game.

My first time was as a junior manager for the USC Trojans, right on the sideline, on New Year’s Day 1977. We beat Michigan that day, 14-6. I still treasure my Rose Bowl ring and watch. Since that day, I have been to eight more Rose Bowls including the three aforementioned Oregon Rose Bowls.

As Gary Horowitz of USA Today wrote there was a time that Oregon even making the Rose Bowl would be relished, and not seen as the warm-up act before the headliner: The BSC National Championship Game.

Part of the reason for the lack of overall excitement by Oregon player’s lies in the fact that the program played in the “Natty” in 2011. That was the dream this year. The Bristol, Connecticut network Pharisees (e.g., former Florida QB Jesse Palmer or former Georgia LB David Pollack) at ES(SEC)PN have already discarded any chance of one loss Oregon playing in the Natty, so the Rose Bowl is now the realistic goal.

Keep in mind that five nationally ranked Pac-12 universities are still in the hunt for Pasadena on New Year’s Day: Oregon, Stanford, Arizona State, USC and UCLA. The latter four do not see the Rose Bowl as a consolation prize.

The precious nature of the Rose Bowl is magnified if one makes a visit to Corvallis, Oregon, Berkeley, California or Tucson, Arizona. The Beavers have not been to the Rose Bowl since 1965 (48 years); the Cal Bears have been shut out of Pasadena since 1959 (54 years); and the Arizona Wildcats have never made it to Pasadena.

And these three schools are not making it this year either.

If Bear Down Arizona or the Old Blues of Cal or the Beaver Nation ever makes it to Pasadena there will be tears shed in Tucson, (even) Berkeley or Corvallis.

No one would be dismissing the Rose Bowl as, “Whatever.”

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10011543/oregon-ducks-unhappy-prospect-rose-bowl-trip

http://bleacherreport.com/tb/dbMv4?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=oregon-ducks-football

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/pac12/2013/11/20/oregon-ducks-rose-bowl-pac-12-marcus-mariota/3659641/

http://www.oregonlive.com/ducks/index.ssf/2013/11/oregon_ducks_football_deanthon_8.html

https://almostdailybrett.wordpress.com/2012/07/12/lifelong-search-for-satisfaction/

Here’s a note to those residing in God’s time zone (e.g., EDT, EST), particularly south of the Mason-Dixon Line.

It’s NOT… OR-EE-GONE … It’s OR-EE-GUN.

Just think of the NRA whenever the BSC … oops BCS … once again snubs that team with the funny mascot located in America’s cul-de-sac, about 2,855.2 miles west of Tallahassee in your pickup truck with OR-EE-GUN racks on the back.

gunrack

Just to make sure that I am not directing all of my ire at Dixie, ESPN’s Tony “Pardon the Interruption” Kornheiser from Long Island, also refers to Oregon as OR-EE-GONE.

Being from New York, he would most likely pronounce the river that runs near Autzen Stadium as the Will-a-MET(s).

Think of it this way and you will never mess up the pronunciation: It’s Will-AM-IT; Damn-it!

Besides-so-many-near-the Atlantic being at best indifferent or at worst intellectually challenged in how to properly pronounce the name of the state located somewhere out on the Pacific Coast, there is the inconvenient problem that comes with the Ducks winning each-and-every game by three touchdowns or more.

Oregon is a solid No. 2 in both polls with first place votes coming from football writers and coaches respectively.

No problem? What? Oh, you are going to solve this annual West Coast annoyance with computers. I have seen this movie before in 2001, and I am not looking forward to the sequel.

Even though the BSC thankfully exists for only 76 more days, the Trilateral Commission for Global Domination by the Eastern Time Zone (TCGDETZ) has already initiated the Oregon snub.

This year may be tougher than most. Let’s say the Ducks knock off nationally ranked UCLA, Stanford (on the road), Oregon State and either UCLA or Arizona State in the Pac-12 championship game to finish at 13-0, how will the BSC arrange for two Southern football factories (or maybe Ohio State) to play for the “Natty”?

The first explanation may revolve around the notion that OR-EE-GONE should be happy to play in the Rose Bowl on New Year’s Day, making it easy for its geographically isolated fans to see their beloved Ducks in yet again, another, other BSC bowl game.

The problem is that the “Natty” is also being played this year in the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, just five days after the Rose Bowl game.

Not to worry. This is the same BSC that chose Nebraska to play Miami in the very same Rose Bowl “Natty” in 2001, even though the Cornhuskers were blown out 62-36 by the Colorado Buffaloes. The Huskers were then annihilated and destroyed by No. 1 Miami, 37-14.

By the way, Oregon thumped that very same Colorado team, 38-16 in the Fiesta Bowl to finish No. 2 in the nation. We were deprived of the opportunity of seeing Oregon play Miami for the whole bowl (no pun intended) of marbles by the BSC.

Even though the fix is in with the BSC setting up SEC Alabama vs. ACC (basketball conference) Florida State clash for the Waterford crystal football, this No. 1 vs. No. 3 system will mercifully go into the history books after Jan. 6, 2014. A four-team playoff will ensue and all the controversy will go away.

What’s that former coach Pat Dye from Ah-BURN in da S.E.C?

DYE

You don’t like that Condoleezza Rice as a member of the College Football Playoff Selection Committee because she is a woman and obviously did not play football?

Let’s see Pat, she was good enough to serve as the nation’s Secretary of State and National Security Advisor and now as the Provost at Stanford University, but she is not qualified to interpret won-loss records, strength of schedule, national rankings and computer modeling for college football teams?

She speaks fluent Russian, plays classical piano, figure skates, took a hand at making sense of the history, culture, religious animosities of the Byzantine Middle East, but she doesn’t have the football necessities to determine who are the best four teams in the country as one-of-13 members of the college football playoff selection committee?

condi

Pat, would you like to have the opportunity to take your comments back?

I have zero issues with Dr. Rice serving on the committee other than she may be predisposed to Stanford over Oregon, but my concern is mitigated that she is only one-of-13 votes.

Best of all, there will be no more BSC with favoritism to those who still pronounce the way-off state with the funny mascot, OR-EE-GONE.

http://www.lostlettermen.com/oregon-fans-enraged-over-bcs-snub/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BCS_controversies

http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/17/condi-rice-respectfully-disagrees-with-pat-dyes-assessment/

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/nationworld/sns-rt-fbc-news-20130628,0,6685898.story

https://www.google.com/#q=Distance+between+Tallahassee+and+Eugene%2C+Oregon

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condoleezza_Rice

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2013/10/16/meet-the-faces-behind-the-college-football-playoff-selection-committee/2993911/

%d bloggers like this: