Tag Archive: Florida State


“I’m in favor of progress; it’s change I don’t like” – Mark Twain

The College Football Playoff is change; it’s not progress.

Instead it has become a shameless vehicle for ESECPN to proclaim the winner of a four-team playoff among the SEC, ACC and maybe the Big-12 as the “national” champion.

If Alabama doesn’t even capture its own division, let alone play and win the Southern Eastern Conference championship … macht nichts … then just place Nick Saban and the Crimson Tide in the College Football Playoff anyway!

What’s the purpose of conference championships?

USC wins the Pac-12 title on a Friday night. Who cares? It’s what happens on the next day that matters.

Ohio State wins the Big 10 title the next day, easily beating previously undefeated Wisconsin. That achievement should matter, until it doesn’t matter.

We all knew when there are five “Power” conferences, and only four playoff slots, one champion would be the odd man out, and not invited to the party.

But two conference champions not being selected to pave the way for two SEC teams to be anointed for the playoff … that’s highway robbery and every other metaphor of outrage that applies.

Clint Eastwood as “Dirty Harry” once opined that opinions are similar to sphincters, everyone has one.

With this introduction here are the dispassionate thoughts from an admitted Pac-12 supporter (i.e., USC undergrad, Oregon post-grad), the author of Almost DailyBrett:

If the Pac-12 is annually dismissed by the Pharisees at ESECPN, and our champion, USC at 11-2, is not even taken seriously for the College Football Playoff …

… And this year, the Big Ten champion, Ohio State 11-2, is also summarily deemed unworthy of the College Football Playoff, then let’s do something radical:

Go back to the good ole days.

The Pac-12 and the Big Ten champions play in The Granddaddy of Them All®, the Rose Bowl.

Yep, let’s celebrate a classic rematch of USC vs. Ohio State playing each other on New Year’s Day.

That’s way it was, and that’s how it should be.

The Granddaddy of Them All®

Oklahoma vs. Georgia in the Rose Bowl, gag me with the proverbial spoon.

The Sooner Schooner being paraded down Colorado Blvd., while UGA does his business in the bushes? Give me a break.

With the BSC followed by the College Football Playoff, we can now conclude college football has taken a huge step backwards.

Consider when Heisman Trophy winner Marcus Mariota and Oregon blew out Florida State 59-20, ending the Seminoles 30-game winning streak and holding the 2015 Rose Bowl Trophy.

Was that a reason for passionate celebration for the Pac-12 champion? Well no, because there was another game.

Ladies and Gentlemen, the Rose Bowl is the game. The author of Almost DailyBrett grew up 20 minutes away from Pasadena. Didn’t want to meet my maker without the Ducks once playing in the Rose Bowl, let alone winning it.

The College Football Playoff Doesn’t Work

We all know now the College Football Playoff doesn’t work.

Expanding it to eight games, just means more slots for SEC and ACC teams.

The Pac-12 and Big Ten should pull out of this monstrosity.

January 2, 2012; Pasadena, CA, USA; Oregon Ducks running back De’Anthony Thomas (6) runs the ball against the Wisconsin Badgers during the second half during the 2012 Rose Bowl. Mandatory Credit: Gary A. Vasquez-US PRESSWIRE

The two conferences should reestablish their exclusive with the Tournament of Roses, having their respective champions play on New Year’s Day.

If ESECPN wants to televise a “playoff” featuring the best-and-the-brightest of teams from the former Confederate States, go for it. Just pour some moonshine and scream “Go Bama, Go!”

Whattya think Rece “Bama” Davis? Concur Jesse “Gator” Palmer? Ditto David “Between the Hedges” Pollack?

For me, it’s time to go back to the Rose Bowl.

USC should be playing Ohio State in the historic Rose Bowl on New Year’s Day in Pasadena, California, not in the Cotton Bowl in Arlington Texas on December 29.

The playoff change did not work.

It’s progress to go back to the Rose Bowl.

http://www.azquotes.com/author/14883-Mark_Twain/tag/change

https://www.tournamentofroses.com/rose-bowl

Believe it or not, college football finally got it right.

Now let’s not screw it up.National Championship - Oregon v Ohio State

Think of it this way, there have been three eras in college football: The Bowl Era; the BCS and for the first time this past season, the College Football Playoff.

Using these three systems, only one would have produced the Ohio State Buckeyes as the national champion even though they would have played Oregon in the terminal bowl under each of the trio of regimes.

The other “champions” would have been Florida State (bowl system) and Alabama (BSC).

The Bowl Era

As a young tadpole, the author of Almost DailyBrett remembers spending virtually all of New Year’s Day watching the bowls.

As a football manager of the USC Trojans in 1976, we lost one damn game, our opener against Missouri at the LA Coliseum. That loss cost us dearly. We were contractually tied into the Rose Bowl. We beat Michigan. We ended up No. 2 in all the land.

Pitt with Heisman Trophy winner Tony Dorsett went to the Sugar Bowl and ended the season, No. 1 and undefeated. We never had a chance to play them.

Using this very same bowl system, Florida State as the ACC champion would have gone to the Orange Bowl. Alabama as the ESECPN champ would been dispatched to the Sugar Bowl. Oregon and Ohio State would have played in “The Granddaddy of Them All,” the Rose Bowl.

If Florida State prevailed in the Orange Bowl, regardless of the opponent, the Seminoles would have been the national champion because of its perfect season and an unbeaten streak of 30-straight. There is zero doubt about this conclusion because everyone else had at least one loss.

Reality check time: This is the same Florida State team that survived a series of close calls against basketball schools only to be literally destroyed by Oregon 59-20 in the Rose Bowl (e.g. first playoff semifinal) as the Ducks feasted on five Florida State turnovers.GTY 460965378 S SPO FBC USA CA

So much for Florida State as the national champion, and its 29-game winning streak.

The BSC Era

In order to solve the automatic bowl tie-in conundrum, the college football gods came up with the Bowl Championship Series (BCS).

Reflecting back on the unfortunate BSC era, the idea was to create a non-subjective human/computer ranking system that would disregard bowl tie-ins and conceivably send the best two teams in all the land to the BCS Championship Game.

Besides triggering coast-to-coast controversy, the flawed subjective system paved the way for sanity to ensue in the form of a four-team playoff.

If the BSC still existed this past season, is there any doubt that Florida State and Alabama (e.g., the two semifinal losers) would have played in the Championship Game? And the winner most likely would have been Alabama, making everyone at ESECPN (e.g., Rece “Alabama” Davis, Jesse “Florida” Palmer, David “Georgia” Pollack, Lee “Florida State” Corso …) real happy.

The two playoff finalists (e.g., the teams that handily beat Alabama and Florida State respectively) would have played in the Rose Bowl. Translated: the result of the Ohio State vs. Oregon Rose Bowl would have been irrelevant in determining the national champion.

Thankfully: The Playoff Era

Ohio State would have been locked into the Rose Bowl under the auspices of the bowl era. Under the BSC, the Buckeyes would have been relegated to the Rose Bowl because the college football Pharisees would have selected undefeated Florida State and ESECPN champ Alabama.

In neither case would Ohio State be able to compete for the national title even though the Buckeyes have now proved they are the best team in the land.

The college football playoff provided the backdrop for Ohio State to play for and win the national title. Baylor and TCU may be upset about being left out of the dance, but doing the Texas two-step … there is no way the Bears or Horned Frogs would have beaten the Buckeyes.

There are some who may clamor for an eight-team playoff or a 16-team playoff, a 32-team playoff, a 64-team playoff, a 128-team playoff (e.g., Oregon State would be playing for the national championship).

Yes, there are five major conferences and increasingly inconsequential Notre Dame and one champion obviously will not make it to the four-team dance. Three wouldn’t have made it to the BSC championship game.buckeye

Let’s leave well enough alone. The College Football Playoff worked. Let’s salute The College Football Playoff for a job well done, and also the Fighting Chestnuts of Ohio State.

http://www.collegefootballplayoff.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowl_Championship_Series

http://www.collegefootballplayoff.com/rose-bowl

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_Bowl_Game

 

 

 

Here’s a note to those residing in God’s time zone (e.g., EDT, EST), particularly south of the Mason-Dixon Line.

It’s NOT… OR-EE-GONE … It’s OR-EE-GUN.

Just think of the NRA whenever the BSC … oops BCS … once again snubs that team with the funny mascot located in America’s cul-de-sac, about 2,855.2 miles west of Tallahassee in your pickup truck with OR-EE-GUN racks on the back.

gunrack

Just to make sure that I am not directing all of my ire at Dixie, ESPN’s Tony “Pardon the Interruption” Kornheiser from Long Island, also refers to Oregon as OR-EE-GONE.

Being from New York, he would most likely pronounce the river that runs near Autzen Stadium as the Will-a-MET(s).

Think of it this way and you will never mess up the pronunciation: It’s Will-AM-IT; Damn-it!

Besides-so-many-near-the Atlantic being at best indifferent or at worst intellectually challenged in how to properly pronounce the name of the state located somewhere out on the Pacific Coast, there is the inconvenient problem that comes with the Ducks winning each-and-every game by three touchdowns or more.

Oregon is a solid No. 2 in both polls with first place votes coming from football writers and coaches respectively.

No problem? What? Oh, you are going to solve this annual West Coast annoyance with computers. I have seen this movie before in 2001, and I am not looking forward to the sequel.

Even though the BSC thankfully exists for only 76 more days, the Trilateral Commission for Global Domination by the Eastern Time Zone (TCGDETZ) has already initiated the Oregon snub.

This year may be tougher than most. Let’s say the Ducks knock off nationally ranked UCLA, Stanford (on the road), Oregon State and either UCLA or Arizona State in the Pac-12 championship game to finish at 13-0, how will the BSC arrange for two Southern football factories (or maybe Ohio State) to play for the “Natty”?

The first explanation may revolve around the notion that OR-EE-GONE should be happy to play in the Rose Bowl on New Year’s Day, making it easy for its geographically isolated fans to see their beloved Ducks in yet again, another, other BSC bowl game.

The problem is that the “Natty” is also being played this year in the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, just five days after the Rose Bowl game.

Not to worry. This is the same BSC that chose Nebraska to play Miami in the very same Rose Bowl “Natty” in 2001, even though the Cornhuskers were blown out 62-36 by the Colorado Buffaloes. The Huskers were then annihilated and destroyed by No. 1 Miami, 37-14.

By the way, Oregon thumped that very same Colorado team, 38-16 in the Fiesta Bowl to finish No. 2 in the nation. We were deprived of the opportunity of seeing Oregon play Miami for the whole bowl (no pun intended) of marbles by the BSC.

Even though the fix is in with the BSC setting up SEC Alabama vs. ACC (basketball conference) Florida State clash for the Waterford crystal football, this No. 1 vs. No. 3 system will mercifully go into the history books after Jan. 6, 2014. A four-team playoff will ensue and all the controversy will go away.

What’s that former coach Pat Dye from Ah-BURN in da S.E.C?

DYE

You don’t like that Condoleezza Rice as a member of the College Football Playoff Selection Committee because she is a woman and obviously did not play football?

Let’s see Pat, she was good enough to serve as the nation’s Secretary of State and National Security Advisor and now as the Provost at Stanford University, but she is not qualified to interpret won-loss records, strength of schedule, national rankings and computer modeling for college football teams?

She speaks fluent Russian, plays classical piano, figure skates, took a hand at making sense of the history, culture, religious animosities of the Byzantine Middle East, but she doesn’t have the football necessities to determine who are the best four teams in the country as one-of-13 members of the college football playoff selection committee?

condi

Pat, would you like to have the opportunity to take your comments back?

I have zero issues with Dr. Rice serving on the committee other than she may be predisposed to Stanford over Oregon, but my concern is mitigated that she is only one-of-13 votes.

Best of all, there will be no more BSC with favoritism to those who still pronounce the way-off state with the funny mascot, OR-EE-GONE.

http://www.lostlettermen.com/oregon-fans-enraged-over-bcs-snub/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BCS_controversies

http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/17/condi-rice-respectfully-disagrees-with-pat-dyes-assessment/

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/nationworld/sns-rt-fbc-news-20130628,0,6685898.story

https://www.google.com/#q=Distance+between+Tallahassee+and+Eugene%2C+Oregon

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condoleezza_Rice

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2013/10/16/meet-the-faces-behind-the-college-football-playoff-selection-committee/2993911/

%d bloggers like this: