Tag Archive: Heisman Trophy


“Marcus Mariota told NFL it is ‘important to him, personally and culturally,’ to be in Hawaii to celebrate the next step in life. No draft for him.” – ESECPN Draft Analyst Adam SchefterMarcus Mariota

There is no joy associated in being picked last for kick ball.

There are permanent scars for some not being asked to junior prom – if you don’t believe Almost DailyBrett, just ask former Rep. Michelle Bachmann.

And then there is the spectacle of the celebrated college football stud, the ultimate BMOC, sitting in a nouveau riche suit bought by his sleaze-ball agent, waiting hours upon hours for his name to be called … and ESECPN cameras covering every nanosecond of the agony.

Does this scenario sound familiar Johnny “Rehab” Manziel? Surely, the home state Dallas Cowboys wouldn’t pass on the 2012 Heisman Trophy winner from Texas A&M with their 16th pick in the first round of the 2014 NFL Draft?

Oops! They did exactly that.

Finally, the Cleveland Browns rescued Johnny with its first-round selection in the 22nd position, ending the sordid spectacle of Manziel being passed up by almost two-dozen teams. In basketball, two teams forever regretted passing on Michael Jordan. Considering that Manziel just emerged from rehab, one can postulate that Cleveland is regretting awarding him with a four-year pact at $8.3 million; $7.55 million guaranteed and a $4.38 million signing bonus.manziel1

Remember storming out of Radio City Music Hall at the 2013 NFL Draft, Geno Smith? Your agent confidently projected you would be picked in the first round. Hmmm? Turned out it was the next night, Round 2, pick #39 overall, before your name was mercifully called by the New York Jets.

The good news, Geno: You were picked by the New York Jets. The bad news, Geno: You were picked by the New York Jets.ginosmith

Why Be There?

Let’s ask the obvious football public relations/reputation management/personal branding question right here and now: Why even show up for the first round, let alone be present for any of the NFL draft?

Do you (e.g., football hero) really need a picture taken of yourself in another new ball cap, a jersey with #1, with the NFL commissioner? Isn’t what you really want, is a contract with as many guaranteed dollars as possible to play a violent game for four years or maybe longer?

Maybe 2013 Heisman Trophy winner Jameis Winston is making a smart public relations move for once by so far deciding to not attend the NFL Draft festivities, even though he may be tempted by his agent to venture to Chicago’s Auditorium Theatre this coming Thursday.

The 2014 Heisman Trophy winner, Marcus Mariota from Oregon, will not be in Chicago. Instead, he will be home in Hawaii with dad, Toa Mariota, and mom, Alana Deppe-Mariota, and his family and friends. Mahalo!mariotaparents

Yes, the author of Almost DailyBrett is a tad biased when it comes to the joys of Oregon football. Having dispensed with that obligatory consumer warning, it is still a great personal and PR move for Marcus to stay away from the draft.

Besides where would you rather be: Hawaii or Chicago?

Character Matters

After the notorious antics of the last two Heisman Trophy winners, Johnny Manziel and Jameis Winston, Mariota is refreshingly boring with his refusal to take any glory upon himself and ALWAYS thinking of his teammates.

Who can forget Mariota breaking down in front of mom and dad, his coaches, and all the past Heisman winners as he accepted the most hallowed trophy in college football? Some wonder whether Mariota is too nice to play in the NFL. The question in some respects is an indictment of the league with its warm-and-cuddly owners, such as Jerry Jones.

When and where to will Marcus be drafted on Thursday? San Diego? Tennessee? Cleveland (bye, bye Johnny no good(e)?) New York Jets? Philadelphia? Some days it seems that Mariota’s draft stock is up and some days it seems that it is down.

Where is Marcus in the mock drafts? It changes from day-to-day. Seems remarkably similar to rolling tracking polling for political campaigns going down to the wire.

These questions all point back to the wisdom and the genuineness of Marcus watching the draft back home in Hawaii with mom, dad, siblings and friends.

If it turns out to take a little longer than expected (who really understands the vagaries of NFL scouting?) at least he will not look like Johnny Manziel or Geno Smith waiting for someone, anyone to draft him.

And that includes the New York Jets.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25130998/report-marcus-mariota-will-not-attend-nfl-draft

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25149193/26-players-to-attend-2015-nfl-draft-no-jameis-winston-marcus-mariota

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnny_Manziel

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geno_Smith

http://espn.go.com/nfl/draft

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Heisman_Trophy_winners

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000350347/article/2014-nfl-draft-firstround-signing-tracker

 

 

 

 

 

“When in doubt, declare victory.” — Oft heard political axiom in Sacramento.

For some reason, Jeff Long, chair of the College Football Playoff Committee, could not simply proclaim that his 12-member committee got it right: The four-best football teams in the country are in the long-awaited, first-ever January 1 playoff for the championship trophy.

In the face of persistent badgering by 1988 Alabama graduate Rece Davis of ESECPN, Long came across as defensive, almost apologetic and unsure. He inadvisably went down paths best left untrodden, and seemingly couldn’t wait for the public grilling to end.

ReceLong

Admittedly, the present University of Arkansas athletic director was operating on little, if no sleep. He and his committee members had a thankless job; shoehorn four major conference champions into two bowls, and leave one big-time conference champion out in the cold (e.g., Baylor).

Guess what? This problem will persist next year. Get used to it.

Here are some PR talking points for Chairman Long free of charge, courtesy of Almost DailyBrett:

“We had a tough job to do. We did our job. And we came up with exciting semifinal matchups involving the best four teams across the fruited plain (i.e., Alabama vs. Ohio State in the Sugar Bowl, and Oregon vs. Florida State in the Rose Bowl). We are proud of our work, and we can hardly wait for January 1.”

Period. Finis. Endo Musico.

Far Better Than The BSC

Many, many moons ago, the conference champs were simply locked into the major bowls. If this scenario was still the case: Alabama would be in the Sugar Bowl; Oregon and Ohio State would be in the Rose Bowl; Florida State would be in the Orange Bowl; Baylor would be in the Fiesta Bowl … and TCU would still be moaning and complaining.

How would one determine the national champion? The polls? The computers? ESECPN?

The BSC … err BCS (Bowl Championship Series) … was devised to improve upon the automatic bowl lock-ups, producing supposedly a matchup of the best two teams in the country.

If that was still the case, Alabama would be playing Oregon and undefeated Florida State would be left out … or would they?

Wait a minute would the BSC exclude the defending national champions, the winner of 29 straight games and counting? Of course not.

Bye-bye, Oregon.

The Tri-Lateral Commission for Dominance by the Eastern Time Zone (TLCDETZ) and ESECPN would not allow a team located in a sparsely populated Western state in America’s cul-de-sac (e.g., Pacific Northwest) to throw a monkey wrench into a classic matchup between SEC-champion Alabama and pseudo-SEC team, Florida State.

You can be sure that Davis (Alabama), Jesse Palmer (Florida), David Pollack (Georgia) and Danny Kanell (Florida State) would not allow that to happen. Ditto for Kirk Herbstreit (Ohio State), Joey Galloway (Ohio State), Lee Corso (Florida State), Desmond Howard (Michigan), Lou Holtz (Kent State) or Mark May (Pitt).

Did you note the time zone for these gents’ alma maters? The Eastern Time Zone.

It must really bum them out that Oregon’s Marcus Mariota is going to win the Heisman. Guess, there really must be life west of the Hudson.

A Four-Team Playoff for the Ages

The committee made the ill-fated decision that Chairman Long was going to be its one-and-only spokesperson.

Don’t get me wrong, Long comes across as a nice competent guy, but does not have the smoothness, confidence and gravitas to serve as an effective spokesman.condi

The committee could have turned to Stanford Provost Condoleezza Rice, who earlier served as national security advisor and secretary of state for two administrations or USC Athletic Director and Rhodes Scholar Pat Haden to carry the PR ball.

Something tells me that neither Rice nor Haden would have publicly punted the ball in the face of the fierce ESECPN verbal pass rush.

haden

Let’s face it: No system is perfect, but this one is easily better than any that has come before or any other (e.g., an eight-team playoff; there are not eight great teams … and number nine would be whining).

This is where the When in doubt, declare victory mantra works.

Regardless of the questions from the Pharisees at ESECPN, a confident spokesperson (e.g., Rice or Haden) keeps coming back to how this system is easily the best, far better than anything that preceded it, and best of all, the top four teams in the land are going to get it on.

Let’s tee it up on New Year’s Day.

http://espn.go.com/college-football/

http://www.collegefootballplayoff.com/selection-committee

http://espnmediazone.com/us/bios/davis_rece/

 

 

It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.” – Teddy Roosevelt

teddyroosevelt

Self-indulgent … Weak, unimaginative songs…” – Rolling Stone magazine review of Led Zeppelin I.

“(The first album) just went over their heads. Absolutely. Absolutely, so. It was way beyond them…” – Led Zeppelin guitarist Jimmy Page reflecting on the initial reviews.

Take that, critics.

There are no statues or monuments to critics.

Ancient and modern-day versions of the Pharisees have always been and will always be with us.

Will Tim Tebow make it in the NFL? If he doesn’t, is it because of his home schooling? His belief in a higher being? His long-time commitment to clean living?

You would think that he never won the Heisman Trophy.

Give him credit for one thing: He is a man in the arena.

In our digital society, our ability and our incessant need to calibrate, to crunch data to smithereens has never been greater.

Didn’t Intel get into major PR trouble in 1994 because the Pentium chip (floating point unit FPU) didn’t compute correctly four or more digits AFTER the decimal point?

When a big league hitter comes to the plate, we all know his batting average, average with RISP (runners in scoring position), home runs, RBIs…all the data that makes Billy Beane, as played by Brad Pitt, salivate.

In nanoseconds, we measure the direction of stocks, market capitalization of companies, price-to-earnings ratios and the “churn” as institutional investors or hedge funds move in-and-out of a security.

In God we trust; All others bring data. – Professor/Author William Edward Deming.

And yet, despite our unquenchable thirst for data, figures and factoids, our lives still remain largely subjective. And there are “Russian judges” that from time-to-time are thumbs down on even our best efforts.

Most sports have a scoreboard. You either win or lose, pure and simple. That is not the case for figure skating, particularly during the troubled days of the Cold War. An American skater would receive the following marks for her performance in the short or long program: 5.8, 5.9, 5.8, 5.7, 5.9, 5.8, 4.5…Wonder who gave her the 4.5? The Russian judge.

The point is the critics are still here. The world has never been more technologically advanced with 90 percent of the scientists, who ever lived, walking around the planet right now. Despite all of this innovation and advancement, we are still for the large part evaluated subjectively by our peers.

We live, and maybe always will reside in a subjective society.

This undeniable fact requires us to remember the most important public relations of all are personal public relations. How do you enhance your personal brand? How do you protect your reputation? Did you “Google” yourself today? Do you like what you see? Or do you need to change course?

Even though job applications with digital cover letters, curriculum vitae, portfolios and URLs are all submitted, and in most cases search engine instantly evaluated for desired “tag” words, the decision whether to hire or not is made by flesh-and-bones people. And of course, people can be political.

As CNBC’s Jim Cramer says, “I don’t care about a stock’s past, only its future.”

cramer

Interviewers are only concerned about whether you will add value to the bottom line. They want to know how you will fit into an organization. They want to know how you will contribute. They want to know whether you have the gravitas to interact effectively with management, customers and other stakeholders. They want to know whether you will be a team player.

How about romance? We might be able to devise a pithy profile with nice JPEG mug shots for Match.com or eHarmony or some other dating site, but whether you succeed or fail in the game of love comes down to the subjective opinion of another person. Are you immediately placed on the friendship track or the romance track? That is the mother of all analog decisions. At some point, there will be a decision whether intimate human contact is in the cards. The ones-and-zeroes play absolutely no role.

Even blog writers are subjected to…ah…subjectivity. Do these words work for you or not? Do you enjoy that picture on the wall? What about the architecture of this building? Or that outdoor landscaping? And how about Led Zeppelin I? Is it “self-indulgent”? Or does it go right over the heads of the critics?

Sometimes, we are talking about questions of taste. Sometimes a critic’s upbringing comes into play or pre-set political philosophies. And maybe despite your best efforts and effective personal public relations, the critic simply doesn’t care for you. It all comes down to eternal subjectivity in a digital world.

Those damn Russian judges. They will always be there to torment us.

http://www.theodore-roosevelt.com/trsorbonnespeech.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhyW3_2f02w

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Tebow

http://t.foxsports.msn.com/nfl/tebows-nfl-days-numbered-after-zero-snaps

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_percentage_of_all_scientists_who_have_ever_lived_are_alive_today

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Edwards_Deming

http://www.cnbc.com/id/15838187

 

 

 

Maybe the Heisman Trophy is not good enough for Matt Barkley?

Ditto for winning the National Championship and being the first pick in the 2013 NFL Draft?

Considering his works and deeds on-and-off the field (are there holes in his hands and feet?), maybe he should be canonized as a saint?

You say that someone must be deceased before he or she can be canonized? Details, details.

My point here is that the slovenly and slobbering media coverage has been uniformly glowing to the point it is already way beyond the point of being over the top. Does Barkley walk on water? Does he change water into wine? Does he part the friggin’ Red Sea?

NCAA Football: San Jose State vs USC SEP 5

There are … count em … 2.38 million Google results about Matt Barkley. He is on the cover of Sports Illustrated. Lindy’s chronicled Saint Matt leading 15 of his teammates heading off to Haiti last May to help the needy. He is a devout Christian. He passed up NFL riches this year to come back and save USC for one more year. Who needs Mother Teresa?

Playboy described him as the “Golden boy.” Mater Dei Matt would probably ask: “Playboy? What is Playboy?”… He really doesn’t want to know.

As I attempt to rationalize the 24/7/365 ESPN coverage of Matt Barkley with some sort of semblance of sanity, please understand that I actually graduated from USC with a degree in Broadcasting Journalism way back in the prior century, 1978. I have a very soft place in my heart for the Trojans, “Conquest,” the Song Girls and Traveler.

At the same time, I am free of the Southland’s polluted inversion layer which seems to cause people stuck on LA freeways to expect nothing less than annual national championships and Heisman Trophies.

As a public relations instructor, Master’s degree recipient and two-decade-plus football season ticket holder at the humbler University of Oregon, I have seen Barkley play live three times against the Ducks. Last year, Barkley torched Oregon for four touchdowns and one pick and 323-yards as the Trojans hung on 38-35 at Autzen Stadium in Eugene.

The previous year, Barkley’s stats were not so divine. He threw one touchdown and two picks (269 yards) against Oregon as the Ducks won 53-32, prompting Trojan fans to take early flight from the Los Angeles Mausoleum.

In Barkley’s first visit to Autzen in 2009, Barkley threw two touchdowns and one pick for 187 yards in a 47-20 frightening Halloween night loss to Oregon.

If you are scoring at home, these results translate into a career 1-2 record (7 TDs and 5 Picks) for Barkley vs. Oregon. He has the opportunity on November 3 back at the LA Mausoleum to even the score. And yet, there is this unprecedented Matt Barkley hyperventilation and histrionics emanating from the foaming-at-the-mouth sports media.

Let’s assume the awarding of the Heisman Trophy, the National Championship and the first pick in the 2013 NFL draft are all administrative acts as it applies to the over-celebrated Matt Barkley. What’s the logical next step?

Only one “person” has ever ascended into heaven and as the Good Book says; he was the son of God. Is Barkley the second son of God? That may be even too much for Matt Barkley.

assumption

How about the second Assumption? The Blessed Mary was assumed into heaven where she now hangs out with Ronald Reagan, Vince Lombardi and Steve Jobs. Why shouldn’t Barkley be the first male to be assumed into the heavens? He could get to know St. Peter on a first name basis.

Besides injecting some humor into Barkleymania, there is a reality here that he should remember: The media is the opposite of the Marine drill sergeant at Camp Pendleton. The Marines beat you down and then build you up as a Marine. The media can build you up as they have done Matt Barkley, but they would rather tear you down and spit you out.

Ask Tiger Woods, if you don’t believe me.

Always be on your guard, Mr. Barkley. Always be on your guard…even if you are assumed into heaven. There are critics everywhere, even there.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonization

http://www.motherteresa.org/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascension_of_Jesus

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assumption_of_Mary

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Barkley

http://articles.latimes.com/2012/aug/15/sports/la-sp-0816-usc-football-20120816

%d bloggers like this: