“No one can take pleasure from seeing bayonets in an American community or on a college campus, but the arrival of the (National) Guard with bayonets brought total de-escalation of hand-to-hand fighting and violence.” — California Governor Ronald Reagan on sending in both the California Highway Patrol and the National Guard to quell escalating rioting at UC Berkeley, May 15, 1969
“Today, our university held firm, enforcing our rules while protecting the constitutional right to free speech. Peaceful protests within our rules are acceptable. Breaking our rules and policies and disrupting others’ ability to learn are not allowed. The group that led this protest stated it was going to violate Institutional Rules. Our rules matter, and they will be enforced. Our university will not be occupied.” — University of Texas at Austin President Jay Hartzell, April 24, 2024
Wondering why the word Progressive became synonymous with Antisemitic?
Are some research university presidents finally standing-up and being counted, when it comes to actually defending the teaching of the best and brightest? How long has it taken for coordinated student campus occupiers to meet their match?
Did university leaders learn from the cashiering of former Harvard president Christine Gay and UPenn president Liz Magill, both guilty of not standing up against raging Antisemitism on their respective campuses.
Is there a growing societal response finally taking a stand against permissive counterculture? Do these peaceful occupation/riots help or hurt the campaign of former President Donald Trump?
Hearts and Minds
Almost DailyBrett grew up during the student riots against the Vietnam War. The conflict was not as simple and clear as the response to the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor.
Vietnam was never adequately explained to the American public. The draft was literally pulling hundreds of thousands out of society and packing them off to Southeast Asia. The student protests questioned American foreign policy in the 1960s and 1970s.
Some of these gatherings (e.g., most notably UC Berkeley) were completely out of control. California Governor Reagan deployed the National Guard. The peaceful protesters, sympathetic faculty and elite media didn’t approve, but the public was overwhelmingly supportive.
The same scenario is being played out for Texas Governor Greg Abbott. The decision to send in the National Guard is never easy, but it’s part of the job. The primary responsibility of government is to provide protection and to ensure safety for its citizens.
Remember the peaceful protesters four years ago? Will campuses likewise burn, if the adults in society don’t or won’t intercede?
Today’s campus riots … err protests from Columbia University on the east coast to your author’s undergraduate alma mater, USC, on the west coast — and many universities in between — concern the actions of a long-time ally beyond America’s borders, 10-time-zones away.
USC has now canceled its university graduation ceremony. Who won? How about student storm troopers, practicing horrific Antisemitism?
Students Supporting Hamas?
“College life today is a day spa, combined with a North Korean re-education camp. It’s a daycare center with a meal plan, except the toddlers can fire the adults. The fact that college presidents, who like to speak out about anything, couldn’t find their voice to condemn the worst attacks since the Holocaust says a lot about who really controls colleges.” — Bill Maher, “Real Time With Bill Maher,” host
Almost DailyBrett attending a football game last November was greeted by dozens of student agitators chanting “From the River to the Sea” as in from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.
Translated: Israel will cease to exist.
Aren’t the termination of Israel and by extension, America, the stated goals of terrorist Hamas (Hezbollah, Iran)? Didn’t they all start the conflagration last October?
Are these Antisemitic students familiar with the Teutonic compound noun, Sturmabteilung? These illiberal campus Braunhemden are knowingly or unknowingly calling for the extermination of Jews, and many of them just don’t understand the evil meaning behind these benign sounding words.
As a former tenure track professor of public relations, marketing, corporate communications and investor relations, Almost DailyBrett clearly comprehends the mission of Research 1 universities: Educate Z-Gens (born 1997 to 2012) and provide them with the skill sets and credentials to succeed in the marketplace and life.
If campuses become unsafe for particular students (e.g., Jewish) and the learning experience is severely diminished/curtailed because of narrow-minded political agendas, society must intercede to restore the beautiful purpose of our university environments.
Ronald Reagan was severely criticized back in the 1960s for sending in the National Guard. Texas Governor Greg Abbott is the target of media elites today.
Guess that goes with the job.
Never Acknowledge, Admit Or Concede
“The man who does nothing cuts the same sordid figure in the pages of history, whether he be cynic, or fop, or voluptuary. There is little use for the being whose tepid soul knows nothing of the great and generous emotion, of the high pride, the stern belief, the lofty enthusiasm, of the men who quell the storm and ride the thunder.” — President Teddy Roosevelt, ‘The Man in the Arena,’ The Sorbonne, April 23, 1910
There are no critics on Mt. Rushmore.
Every time a tepid soul journalist would ask Almost DailyBrett to acknowledge, admit or concede, the answer was an automatic, ‘no.’
The reason is simple: There was and still is a 99 percent chance that anything and everything acknowledged, admitted or conceded will be immediately seized by a carnivorous partisan reporter, correspondent, editor or anchor.
It’s the beastly nature of the nattering nabobs of negativism.
Ever wonder why Donald Trump refuses to apologize, and never will? Acknowledging, admitting or conceding — let alone apologizing — demonstrates sniveling weakness to be immediately devoured by predatory cat-nip journalists.
Would you rather be seen in the vain of Teddy Roosevelt’s “Man in the Arena” or appeasing Neville Chamberlain?
What about the truth? A Man or a Woman in the Arena should always tell the truth. That does not mean allowing reporters with prescribed political agendas to put incendiary words into your mouth. Part of the 1st Amendment Rights to Free Speech is the prerogative to disagree and to actually displease the Fourth Estate.
As Almost DailyBrett has repeatedly lamented about political reporters taking sides. They will advance stories that work against you, and ignore those that advance your cause. If they can put words in your mouth that coincide with their litmus-test, they will happily do so.
As a former Republican press secretary for eight years, your author knows the vast majority of journalists wanted us to fail big time. The undeniable fact that California is now a one-party basket case is partially attributable to the loss of objectivity in the Sacramento Press Corps. That has not always been the case, but it’s true right now.
Almost DailyBrett pointed out the journalists of yesteryear (e.g., 1980s and earlier) were better, fairer and open to both sides. They gathered the facts and reported the news.
Analysis, Commentary and Interpretation
“I’m certain that the truth exists for you and probably for the person sitting next to you. But this may not be the same truth. This is because the truth of the matter is very often, for many people, what happens when we merge facts about the world with our beliefs about the world. So we all have different truths.” — NPR chief executive officer Katherine Maher
Different truths?
Is Ms. Maher saying that all truths are not created the same or that some are more equal than others? Are elite media beliefs and infallible truths the same? At least they don’t cause a distraction to getting things done.
Isn’t the job of fair, objective, both sides, professional journalists to separate truths from beliefs and report on the real truths whatever they may be? It’s used to be called, fact-based Journalism.
Ever heard of editorials in drag? They’re all around you, particularly in this age of digital/social media.
Who decides? Increasing it’s those who arrogantly craft analysis, prepare commentaries and offer interpretations as in their own analysis, their own commentary and their own interpretations. Who elected these journalists? Where are their statues?
At their best they are Devil’s advocates posing questions to elicit quotable responses. That’s fair game.
When they are trying to infuse incendiary language on to the lips of message developers/spokesperson to advance their self-serving analysis, commentary and interpretation that practice is further contributing to the record loss of American trust in today’s so-called journalists.
https://www.theodorerooseveltcenter.org/Learn-About-TR/TR-Encyclopedia/Culture-and-Society/Man-in-the-Arena.aspx
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/npr-ceo-calls-first-amendment-the-number-one-challenge-in-america/ar-BB1lOi3s
Share this: